Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 27(3): 242-6, 2006 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16464561

RESUMO

A total of 123 clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae were collected from all over Lebanon and tested for their susceptibility to penicillin: 30.1% were susceptible (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) < or = 0.06 microg/mL), 56.1% were intermediately susceptible (MIC 0.09-1.0 microg/mL) and 13.8% were resistant (MIC > 1.0 microg/mL). The oxacillin disk screening test detected all penicillin-resistant isolates, but erroneously designated two penicillin-intermediate isolates as penicillin susceptible. All isolates were consistently susceptible to levofloxacin, but cross-resistance between penicillin and the three tested cephalosporins was frequently noted. The in vitro activity of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid paralleled that of penicillin; however, 92.7% of the isolates were designated as susceptible based on the recommended interpretive cut-off point (MIC < or = 2/1 microg/mL). This discrepancy represents a paradox that deserves serious consideration.


Assuntos
Resistência às Penicilinas , Infecções Pneumocócicas/microbiologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Líbano , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Penicilinas/farmacologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...